Know exactly what is wrong before you invest in fixing it
Independent review of your CRM solution architecture -- configuration quality, data model design, integration resilience, scalability ceiling, and technical debt -- with a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Page load times are increasing. Users report intermittent failures. Complex reports timeout before completing. The system is technically live but behavioural problems are accumulating and the root cause is unknown.
02
The architecture will not scale to the next growth stage
The CRM works at current volumes. A new product launch or acquisition will triple the user base and transaction volume. Nobody is confident the current architecture will hold -- and nobody wants to find out at the worst possible moment.
03
Technical debt from years of reactive configuration
Three years of configuration decisions made under deadline pressure. Nobody has ever reviewed the cumulative architecture. There are almost certainly undocumented dependencies, conflicting automations, and unsupported customisations that will cause problems eventually.
04
Pre-acquisition or pre-investment due diligence required
A potential acquirer or investor has requested a technical due diligence report on the CRM architecture. The internal team cannot objectively self-assess. An independent expert review is required to produce a report that external parties will trust.
What is included
Everything in this service
Configuration Review
Assess the quality of the CRM configuration against best practice -- object model design, field naming and organisation, validation rule quality, automation logic, profile and permission architecture, and customisation supportability.
Object model assessmentField architecture reviewValidation rule auditPermission model review
Deliverables
vConfiguration review report
vObject model assessment
vField architecture findings
vPermission model recommendations
Data Model Assessment
Review the data model design -- object relationships, custom field proliferation, data type choices, indexing, and the degree to which the data model will support future use cases including AI and analytics.
Object relationship designCustom field assessmentIndexing & query performanceFuture use case readiness
Deliverables
vData model assessment report
vObject relationship diagram
vField proliferation analysis
vAI & analytics readiness assessment
Integration Architecture
Assess every integration connected to the CRM -- documentation quality, error handling, retry logic, monitoring coverage, dependency risk, and the degree to which the integration landscape is governable and maintainable.
Prioritise every finding by business risk, technical complexity, and remediation cost -- and sequence them into a 12-month remediation roadmap with effort estimates, dependencies, and quick wins that deliver immediate value.
Define the review scope -- which CRM objects, which integrations, which architecture dimensions -- and agree the depth of analysis required for each area.
02
Architecture review
2-week deep-dive across configuration quality, data model design, integration resilience, security architecture, and scalability ceiling.
03
Findings analysis
Analyse every finding for business risk, technical complexity, and remediation cost. Score and prioritise the register.
04
Roadmap development
Sequence findings into a 12-month prioritised remediation roadmap with effort estimates and dependency mapping.
05
Report delivery
Deliver the architecture review report, findings register, and roadmap in a presentation to the senior technical and business stakeholders.
The architecture review identified 23 findings we were completely unaware of -- including two that would have caused serious data loss under specific concurrency conditions. We would not have found them without an independent review. The remediation roadmap became our 2025 technical programme.
C
CTO
FinTech Company
We engaged Celumai for an architecture review ahead of a Series B raise. The investor's technical due diligence team reviewed the report and described it as one of the most thorough CRM architecture assessments they had seen. It gave the investors confidence in our technical foundation and contributed directly to closing the round.
Your Solution Architecture Review questions, answered
2 weeks from kickoff to report delivery for a standard single-platform CRM review. Reviews covering multiple CRM instances, complex integration landscapes, or additional infrastructure components take 3 to 4 weeks. The timeline is agreed at the scoping call based on the specific environment.
A written architecture review report covering every dimension assessed, a prioritised findings register with risk ratings and remediation effort estimates, a 12-month remediation roadmap, and a presentation of findings to senior stakeholders. Every deliverable is produced in formats your team can work from independently.
Yes. Most architecture reviews cover systems built by other parties -- previous consultancies, internal teams, or platform integrators. An independent reviewer who had no involvement in the original design is better positioned to assess it objectively. We bring no bias toward defending previous decisions.
The architecture review is entirely confidential. Findings are delivered to you and used only as instructed. We do not share, publish, or reference specific client findings in any form without explicit written permission.
Yes. We produce architecture review reports specifically structured for technical due diligence -- an independent expert assessment that external parties including investors, acquirers, and auditors will trust. The report format and depth of analysis is adapted for external audience requirements.
Yes. Many architecture review clients proceed to remediation engagements with us. The review creates the brief for the remediation programme -- findings are already scoped, prioritised, and effort-estimated. There is no obligation to engage us for remediation, but the transition is seamless if you do.
Yes. Profile and permission architecture, field-level security, sharing model design, API access controls, and session security settings are included in every architecture review as standard. For environments with specific security or compliance requirements (BFSI, healthcare, government) we offer an extended security architecture module.
Every finding is scored across three axes -- business risk (what happens if this is not fixed), technical complexity (how difficult is it to fix), and remediation cost (how much will it take to address). The roadmap sequences findings to address the highest business risk at the lowest cost first, while ensuring complex, high-value remediations are started early enough in the 12 months to complete.
Ready to start?
Request an architecture review
We respond within 1 business day with an honest assessment -- no commitment required.